<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Nick and Not Matsui?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Ham</title>
		<link>http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/comment-page-1/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebronxview.com/?p=2079#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>Pon,
That&#039;s incorrect.  I never said Matsui &quot;will&quot; decline in one year; I said he &quot;could&quot; decline.  I also said I would have re-signed Matsui for a year so the conclusion you have drawn doesn&#039;t match what I wrote.

Cashman had to judge risk against cost in this situation and he didn&#039;t feel Matsui could repeat last year&#039;s performance based on what the Yankees knew about his health.  Matsui is certainly a capable hitter who can put up good numbers which is why I wanted him re-signed.  But if he can&#039;t stay healthy or effective, he isn&#039;t very helpful.

Johnson is a risk as well but he&#039;s a lower risk because he doesn&#039;t have a chronic injury, he&#039;s younger and cheaper.  And he can play defense which Matsui can not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pon,<br />
That&#8217;s incorrect.  I never said Matsui &#8220;will&#8221; decline in one year; I said he &#8220;could&#8221; decline.  I also said I would have re-signed Matsui for a year so the conclusion you have drawn doesn&#8217;t match what I wrote.</p>
<p>Cashman had to judge risk against cost in this situation and he didn&#8217;t feel Matsui could repeat last year&#8217;s performance based on what the Yankees knew about his health.  Matsui is certainly a capable hitter who can put up good numbers which is why I wanted him re-signed.  But if he can&#8217;t stay healthy or effective, he isn&#8217;t very helpful.</p>
<p>Johnson is a risk as well but he&#8217;s a lower risk because he doesn&#8217;t have a chronic injury, he&#8217;s younger and cheaper.  And he can play defense which Matsui can not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pon</title>
		<link>http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/comment-page-1/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>pon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebronxview.com/?p=2079#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>Your logic (age) must tell that the Yankees should let Jeter walk next year toghether with A-Rod, Mo, Posada.

Your logic (Matsui will decline just in a year) has no reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your logic (age) must tell that the Yankees should let Jeter walk next year toghether with A-Rod, Mo, Posada.</p>
<p>Your logic (Matsui will decline just in a year) has no reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebronxview.com/?p=2079#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>I know people will look at Nick&#039;s SLG and HR totals from last year and think we&#039;ve essentially installed a singles hitter at the top of the lineup, but I don&#039;t necessarily agree.  Smart guys like Will Carroll seem to think wrist injuries sap power, and last year was Nick&#039;s first following wrist surgery.  He has a career .447 SLG and in his last season before the wrist injury, he hit 23 HR and slugged .520.  

I think it&#039;d be wild to expect him to fully return to those levels, but I think he can improve upon and possibly even double his HR total of 8 from last season, especially in his new home park which appears to be a boon for left-handed power.  Combine that with his extraordinary patience, and I think he&#039;s a more than suitable replacement for Damon&#039;s bat.  Then you&#039;ve got the power-hitting lefty Granderson replacing Matsui&#039;s bat and (hopefully) providing above average defense, and - call me crazy - this team could be nearly as good offensively as they were last year.

I say nearly because Tex, Swisher, Jeter, and even Posada have tough acts to follow.  Let&#039;s add a starter and head to Spring Training already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know people will look at Nick&#8217;s SLG and HR totals from last year and think we&#8217;ve essentially installed a singles hitter at the top of the lineup, but I don&#8217;t necessarily agree.  Smart guys like Will Carroll seem to think wrist injuries sap power, and last year was Nick&#8217;s first following wrist surgery.  He has a career .447 SLG and in his last season before the wrist injury, he hit 23 HR and slugged .520.  </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;d be wild to expect him to fully return to those levels, but I think he can improve upon and possibly even double his HR total of 8 from last season, especially in his new home park which appears to be a boon for left-handed power.  Combine that with his extraordinary patience, and I think he&#8217;s a more than suitable replacement for Damon&#8217;s bat.  Then you&#8217;ve got the power-hitting lefty Granderson replacing Matsui&#8217;s bat and (hopefully) providing above average defense, and &#8211; call me crazy &#8211; this team could be nearly as good offensively as they were last year.</p>
<p>I say nearly because Tex, Swisher, Jeter, and even Posada have tough acts to follow.  Let&#8217;s add a starter and head to Spring Training already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Ham</title>
		<link>http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebronxview.com/?p=2079#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you&#039;re giving Cashman enough credit.  I would have liked to have seen the Yankees re-sign Matsui, but there is a good possibility his knees (or other ailments) will get worse at his age.  The Yankees lived with it more than anyone and know the maintenance it took to keep him on the field.

That&#039;s not to say that Nick doesn&#039;t have his issues, but he hasn&#039;t had any chronic issues.  Most of his injuries have been one-off injuries that are not related to each other, save an injury to his right wrist and later his right hand.

I think Cashman had Matsui at a certain price point but Matsui expressed interest in playing the field.  Cashman said no and Matsui sniffed around.  If Cashman wanted Matsui back, Matsui would have been back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re giving Cashman enough credit.  I would have liked to have seen the Yankees re-sign Matsui, but there is a good possibility his knees (or other ailments) will get worse at his age.  The Yankees lived with it more than anyone and know the maintenance it took to keep him on the field.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that Nick doesn&#8217;t have his issues, but he hasn&#8217;t had any chronic issues.  Most of his injuries have been one-off injuries that are not related to each other, save an injury to his right wrist and later his right hand.</p>
<p>I think Cashman had Matsui at a certain price point but Matsui expressed interest in playing the field.  Cashman said no and Matsui sniffed around.  If Cashman wanted Matsui back, Matsui would have been back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Isberto</title>
		<link>http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/comment-page-1/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Isberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebronxview.com/?p=2079#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>Blame Damon and Boras for failure of the Yankees to sign Matsui. The greed of Damon and Boras has stalled negotiations with the Yankees forcing Matsui to look elsewhere. 

The Yankees are just lucky that Nick Johnson is still available at the right price. Nick is not a superstar but he has decent numbers, one that the Yankees will benefit from.

That&#039;s the way the ball rolls. You win some, you lose some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blame Damon and Boras for failure of the Yankees to sign Matsui. The greed of Damon and Boras has stalled negotiations with the Yankees forcing Matsui to look elsewhere. </p>
<p>The Yankees are just lucky that Nick Johnson is still available at the right price. Nick is not a superstar but he has decent numbers, one that the Yankees will benefit from.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the way the ball rolls. You win some, you lose some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Ham</title>
		<link>http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/comment-page-1/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebronxview.com/?p=2079#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>Because the backend of Holliday&#039;s deal could be risky.  Cashman viewed Teixeira as a more sure thing than Holliday and I agree with him.  He&#039;s the type of contract the Yankees are trying to avoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the backend of Holliday&#8217;s deal could be risky.  Cashman viewed Teixeira as a more sure thing than Holliday and I agree with him.  He&#8217;s the type of contract the Yankees are trying to avoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick blasioli</title>
		<link>http://www.thebronxview.com/2009/12/18/why-nick-and-not-matsui/comment-page-1/#comment-1680</link>
		<dc:creator>nick blasioli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebronxview.com/?p=2079#comment-1680</guid>
		<description>why not sign holliday....then they would be set for a while....forget next years free agents...this team with holliday is tops and practically unbeatable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not sign holliday&#8230;.then they would be set for a while&#8230;.forget next years free agents&#8230;this team with holliday is tops and practically unbeatable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  file_get_contents(http:) [<a href='function.file-get-contents'>function.file-get-contents</a>]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in <b>/home/content/28/4730628/html/wp-includes/class-feed.php</b> on line <b>97</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  file_get_contents(http:) [<a href='function.file-get-contents'>function.file-get-contents</a>]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in <b>/home/content/28/4730628/html/wp-includes/class-feed.php</b> on line <b>97</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  file_get_contents(http:) [<a href='function.file-get-contents'>function.file-get-contents</a>]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in <b>/home/content/28/4730628/html/wp-includes/class-feed.php</b> on line <b>97</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  file_get_contents(http:) [<a href='function.file-get-contents'>function.file-get-contents</a>]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in <b>/home/content/28/4730628/html/wp-includes/class-feed.php</b> on line <b>97</b><br />
